May 2012

Engineering Case Histories

Case 68: Pneumatic testing dangers

Use caution on what defines a true ‘safe distance’

Sofronas, A., Consulting Engineer

I’ve written previously on hydro and pneumatic testing and how it’s an engineer’s responsibility to question dangerous conditions.1,2 Unfortunately, I still see failures and have been asked what is a safe distance to be at when performing a pneumatic test.3,4 When defining “safe distances” from a pneumatic explosion, a major concern is defining the numerous flying fragments. To understand the energy involved in pneumatic testing, the pressurized air will be treated as a compressed spring. The energy released will be used to propel a fragment horizontally. Fig. 1 shows a fictitious gas spring in a vessel with a spring constant, k, in lb/in., and compressed d, in. The

Log in to view this article.

Not Yet A Subscriber? Here are Your Options.

1) Start a FREE TRIAL SUBSCRIPTION and gain access to all articles in the current issue of Hydrocarbon Processing magazine.

2) SUBSCRIBE to Hydrocarbon Processing magazine in print or digital format and gain ACCESS to the current issue as well as to 3 articles from the HP archives per month. $409 for an annual subscription*.

3) Start a FULL ACCESS PLAN SUBSCRIPTION and regain ACCESS to this article, the current issue, all past issues in the HP Archive, the HP Process Handbooks, HP Market Data, and more. $1,995 for an annual subscription.  For information about group rates or multi-year terms, contact email Peter Ramsay or call +44 20 3409 2240*.

*Access will be granted the next business day.

Related Articles

From the Archive



{{ error }}
{{ comment.comment.Name }} • {{ comment.timeAgo }}
{{ comment.comment.Text }}