Environment & Safety Gas Processing/LNG Maintenance & Reliability Petrochemicals Process Control Process Optimization Project Management Refining

Glencore unit to pay $27 million for biofuels compliance

(Reuters) Glencore’s bunker fuel unit has agreed to pay a $27 MM penalty and retire over $71 MM worth of credits for compliance with the US biofuels program to resolve charges it violated the policy, the US government said Thursday.

The US Department of Justice and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) alleged that Chemoil Corp. exported at least 48.5 MM gallons of biodiesel from the US from 2011 to 2013 but failed to retire the associated renewable identification numbers generated for the exported fuel.

In addition to paying the highest-ever civil penalty in such a case, Chemoil will have to retire some 65 MM renewable fuel credits in the settlement, the Justice Department said. It has already retired 7.7 MM.

The credits are used by oil refiners and gasoline importers to prove they are meeting government mandates for use of ethanol and biodiesel in gasoline and diesel.

The removal of millions of the credits, known as Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs), from the market will likely stoke mounting worries over tightening inventories of the credits. Oil refiners and others have said that prices of credits are soaring in response to the US government's plan to boost renewable fuel mandates next year.

Prices of renewable fuel (D6) credits for 2016 compliance traded as high as $0.90 apiece following the news, then eased back to $0.88 - $0.89 cents each.

The biomass-based diesel (D4) credits for current year traded up to $1.02 apiece, up from a range of $0.99 - $1.00 each previously, they said.

A New York-based products trader said the penalty would strengthen a rally in distillate, or diesel, prices, including ultra-low sulfur diesel futures on the New York Mercantile Exchange, which rose 1% Thursday.

The diesel prices tend to rise with RINs to compensate for US producers' cost of buying the credits.

The RIN market has been rife with fraud in previous years, and the US government has settled a number of cases of past fraud in recent months.

By David Alexander, Chris Prentice and Jessica Resnick-Ault

Related News

From the Archive

Comments

Comments

{{ error }}
{{ comment.name }} • {{ comment.dateCreated | date:'short' }}
{{ comment.text }}